EVERETT — A judge has ruled against an animal-rights
group that sought to file a rarely used citizen's complaint against
three former employees of an Everett animal-testing lab who sent a
monkey through a cage washer, scalding the animal to death.
Everett District Court Judge Roger Fisher said
Wednesday that a jury likely couldn't reach a guilty verdict in the
case if it were to go to trial. Fisher refused to overrule Snohomish
County prosecutors and the city attorney's office, which didn't find
sufficient evidence to file charges in the case.
Invoking a rarely used law, Pasado's Safe Haven
petitioned the court to bring a citizen's criminal prosecution of
three former employees at Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (SNBL).
The Monroe animal-rights group was concerned that no charges had
been filed nearly a year after the cynomolgus macaque monkey died.
But Fisher said he had no intention of "substituting
my judgment" for the decisions made by Joan Cavagnaro, the county's
chief criminal deputy prosecutor, and Everett City Attorney Mike
Fisher (no relation).
Bellingham attorney Adam Karp, who is representing
Pasado's Safe Haven, said employees at the lab failed to remove the
monkey from its cage before the animal's cage was sent through a
washer with scalding hot water on Nov. 1, 2007. Lab officials have
said the animal's death was an accident.
Susan Michaels, founder of Pasado's Safe Haven, said
Fisher's decision "is just disappointing."
"What we would have like to have seen is a decision
that would have given the opportunity for a thorough investigation,"
Michaels said.
Karp said he may appeal Fisher's decision to
Snohomish County Superior Court, in hopes that a judge there will
agree that charges should be filed.
After Wednesday's hearing, Seattle attorney John
Wolfe, who represents SNBL, said the company was pleased by Fisher's
decision. He said the company "feels horrible" about the animal's
death.
Fisher said that he was bothered by Karp's request,
especially since the attorney has a separate case pending review by
the state Supreme Court dealing with the constitutionality of
citizens complaints.
"Mr. Karp is asking me is to wear two hats," Fisher
said, referring to his role as a judge and the fact he was asked to
step in and make a decision normally left to a prosecutor.
Explaining the citizen's complaint process,
Cavagnaro said "a private citizen may petition a district court to
allow them to file a complaint, which initiates a formal criminal
procedure."
The judge, she said, has to be satisfied that
probable cause exists to allow the complaint to go forward.
Once the complaint is filed, the prosecutor "has the
authority and obligation to handle any criminal proceeding in the
district," she added.
Lawyers in Snohomish and King counties say the
process is so rarely used that they have heard of it being presented
to a judge only twice in the past 30 years.